Supply Chain Market Research - SCMR LLC
  • Blog
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact

Light Me Up

4/7/2025

0 Comments

 

Light Me Up

The US government has been working toward providing high-speed internet (100Mbs) to all Americans, but while the FCC shows that only 1.5% of those living in urban areas don’t have such access, 22.5% in rural areas are without same and much of that population has 25Mbs or less.  The BEAD program, a $42.45b government funded program that provides subsidy capital to each state to expand high-speed internet access to rural communities is a major driver behind the efforts to broaden high-speed internet coverage, however while the program was signed into law on 11/15/21 and funded by Congress on 6/26/23, the progress has been slow with preparation for construction underway, but with few providers willing to step up before capital is allocated.
Here's the current BEAD status:
  • 56 of 56 state and territory applications have been approved by the NTIA
  • 47 of 56 entities have completed the state challenge process
  • 32 of 56 entities have begun selecting service providers
  • 4 of 56 entities have completed service provider selection
  • 3 of 56 have released final proposal for public comment
In most cases the construction will be primarily the laying or stringing of fiber, a complex and costly process that entails gaining right-of-way access, local permits and the cost of trenching fiber, which can run, depending on the location, between $15,000 and $20,000/km and can take weeks to install.  In some cases it is just not feasible to bury fiber optic cable, so it must be strung, leading to higher annual maintenance costs, but there are alternatives.
Elon Musk’s Starlink (pvt) system, a group of LEO satellites that provide coverage in certain areas, presents an alternative.  However the service is relatively expensive at $300 - $400 for the hardware (basic) and between ~$80 and $120/ month for residential customers.  While Starlink has brought down the cost of placing satellites in orbit, it is expected that the current network of a few hundred satellites would likely have to be brought up to a much higher number to provide global service, and at a cost of ~$1m each (that’s the reduced cost) to launch  new Starlink satellites and a ~5 year life for existing ones, the cost of such a system would seem to make it an option that is not suitable for rural areas where much of the population is low-income.  Unless funded by the government Starlink would seem to be out or reach for many and  currently funding for such programs is quite difficult as Congress recently let the Affordable Connectivity Program, which supplemented the monthly cost of internet access for low-income families expire.
The is another alternative when the cost of fiber installation is prohibitive or virtually impossible and the customer economics do not make sense for satellite.  The technology is FSOC, aka Free Space Optical Communication, and is used commercially as both a last mile alternative in fiber systems, for disaster recovery when other means of communication are unavailable, and in military tactical situations as it provides a high bandwidth point-to-point link that is inexpensive and easy to deploy.  The technology is relatively simple to understand as it consists of:
  • Optical Transceiver – This consists of a laser which carries the signal
  • Modulator – Takes the incoming signal and encodes it into the laser beam using intensity or other optical properties.
  • Optics – Lenses and mirrors that shape and direct the laser beam.
  • PAT System (Pointing, Acquisition, & Tracking) – This system has movable platforms that can steer the laser beam.  Sensors and cameras detect the position of the incoming signal and control hardware and software that calculates position and adjusts the beam.
  • Optical Amplifier – Increases the signal strength in longer range FSOC systems and compensates for atmospheric changes.
Depending on the installation, commercial FSOC systems have a maximum range of 20km. (~12 miles) on a direct line-of-sight basis, but has lower latency than RF (satellite) and very low installation cost (~$1,000/km).  Here’s how it stacks up against fiber and satellite:
Picture
As with all communication that travels through the atmosphere, different conditions can cause issues with key variables in optical systems  FSOC systems that are for short distances (campus, etc.) typically operate at 850nm, while longer distance systems, where the effects of weather are more pronounced, operate at 1310nm and 1550nm,which are less affected by rain or snow and are compatible with fiber operating wavelengths.  When the weather is poor (droplets reflect and absorb laser light) FSOC systems can adapt in a number of ways, the primary being by increasing power, similar to RF systems (satellite).  However RF systems are power limited so as not to overpower adjacent bands, while FSOC is limited only by laser (eye) safety requirements.
Other techniques, such as spatial diversity (similar to MIMO), essentially creating multiple optical paths (multiple lasers) or multiple frequency paths for data, adding repeaters (shortening the signal path), specialized modulation techniques that vary the data rate depending on weather, and predictive atmospheric modeling for proactive adjustments, all can contribute to offsetting the atmospheric issues that occur with atmospheric optical systems.  We note also that maintaining precise alignment with the sensors at the receiver end is a key function, as small variations can interrupt transmission, however FSOC systems have progressed substantially, allowing them to self-correct and maintain a solid line-of-sight connection in almost all circumstances, and new chip level systems reduce the lens and mirror count considerably, making the systems even more stable.
Interestingly, what brought FSOC technology back to our attention was the fact that Alphabet (GOOGL) recently spun out Taara (pvt), an FSOC company from its “Moonshot Incubator” (Where ‘Google Brain’ lab and Waymo (pvt) came from) retaining a minority stake along with initial VC funding, with the idea that the company can now look at other financing options.  We originally heard about Taara back years ago (2018) when Google (GOOG) mentioned a project (LOON) that was attempting to create a system of high-altitude (stratosphere) balloons that could deliver internet service to remote locations across the globe, an idea we thought foolish.  While the laser technology (Free-space optics) has been used to communicate with the International Spece Station the idea seemed a bit on the ridiculous side, and eventually the Loon project was cancelled due to regulatory issues about flying large ballons in public airspace.
That said, the laser technology continued to be developed and refined and the company has announced (2026 release) the development of a silicon photonics chip that will replace the mirrors, sensors, and hardware used to ‘steer’ the laser light with software, reducing the overall size of the Lightbridge (the company’s current product), which is roughly the size of a traffic light, to a single chip containing the emitters and all of the directional correcting mechanisms.  The new chip is the size of a fingernail and is expected to be incorporated in a new (much smaller) device.  This will allow the company to lower the hardware and installation price and create modules that are able to deployed indoors, such as on a factory floor (ceiling).
Picture
Figure 1 – Current Lightbridge FSOC Unit - Source: Taara
PictureFigure 2 - 2026 FSOC Chip - Source: Taara
Taara has deployed its systems with a number of partners in a number of unusual instances.  One such was in Pipeline Estate, a low-income, densely populated community in Nairobi, Kenya.  Taara’s partner in Nairobi expected to see a large number of sign-ups when the service was connected, but after a few early new customer sign- ups things tailed off quickly.  After close examination it turned out those new users were consuming ~10 times the normal bandwidth and after a more detailed scrutiny they found that each of the new users were reselling pieces the large bandwidth now available.  At a cost of $10 to the primary user and a similar price to their shadow customers, they were making a substantial profit on the new service.  As this was not the model expected, the company created software that allowed ISPs and local residents to ‘micro-share’ the bandwidth and manage the usage.  Taara, after that experience, that capitalized on this situation and devised a system that allowed retail store owners to resell connectivity from the Taara system as an extra income source.
In India, Aitel (532454.IN) has used Taara’s system for FWA backhaul in conjunction with microwave links in a number of areas in India where physical issues (rivers, mountains, etc.) have limited capacity as a hybrid solution, and to provide service to locations where India’s well-known bureaucracy made it difficult or impossible to get microwave licensing within a reasonable amount of time. 
T-Mobile (TMUS) has used the technology to provide cell service at Coachella and the Albuquerque International Balloon Fiesta, where large crowds typically overloaded cell systems and laying fiber was definitely not cost effective.  As the Taara system could be set up quickly, they were able to provide 5G service for over a million calls over the nine day festivals at 99.9% uptime.  The Taara system was attached to a fiber link 2 km from the festival and paired with a T-Mobile Cell-on-Wheels station near the event and a second COW about a mile away.
There are others working on FSOC technology, but as can be seen below, most are looking at the technology from a military perspective, with few focused on backhaul as an adjunct to fiber.
  • Raytheon (RTX) – has developed “NexGen Optix”, a FSOC tactical communication system for “challenging environments” to provide secure connectivity.

Picture
Figure 3 - Raytheon NexGen Optix field communication system- Source: Raytheon
  • Viasat (VSAT)– Viasat’s Mercury FSOC for military applications including ground-to-ground, ground to Air, Ship-to-ship, and ship-to-ground secure communication based on DOD requirements.
Picture
Figure 4 - Viasat Mercury FSOC system - Source: Viasat
  • Mynaric (pvt) – Laser-based communication (FSOC) between flying objects (satellites, planes, drones, etc.) to transfer data between objects and the earth.
Picture
​Figure 5 - Mynaric - aerial communication module - Source: Mynaric
  • fSona Networks (pvt) – FSOC back haul system but no active website.  Recent reverse merger
  • CaiLabs (pvt) – Primarily aerospace and defense base stations and fiber lasers but also have TILBA-LOS FSOC point-to-point to be released this year.
Most of the FSOC development we have seen is oriented toward military applications and air-to-ground communication, likely the reason why Alphabet figures it’s time to a move Taara from the lab to a more potentially financially viable position.  This technology is relatively new to the back-haul market and seems to have become robust enough that it can have a place among other high bandwidth communication technologies, along with some more specific applications where laying fiber is not practical due to physical issues. 
While the more obvious cases are related to geophysical objects (rivers, offshore islands, and emergency disaster communication) short-haul links in urban areas where the cost and time to lay fiber is prohibitive, but line-of-site is available, does make sense if the technology proves to be as cost effective as Taara seems to indicate.  With the ability to eliminate much of the hardware needed to maintain alignment, the cost of base stations and repeaters should continue to drop, making the FSOC viable in more instances and certainly more competitive against regulated systems (microwave, RF).  While FSOC would not completely solve the need for high-speed, low-cost internet across the US, used in conjunction with fiber, it has the potential to make a dent, if the silicon proves to be as cost effective as it is promoted to be.   It’s a long way from the ballon network…
 
Please note that we do not receive any compensation from or have any connection to the companies or technology we write about.  We look for interesting products, companies, and technologies that we believe might be of interest to our readers.  While we might speak with some of these companies, we receive no proprietary information, and all opinions are our own.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    We publish daily notes to clients.  We archive selected notes here, please contact us at: ​[email protected] for detail or subscription information.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    November 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    January 2018
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016

    Categories

    All
    5G
    8K
    Aapl
    AI
    AMZN
    AR
    ASML
    Audio
    AUO
    Autonomous Engineering
    Bixby
    Boe
    China Consumer Electronics
    China - Consumer Electronics
    Chinastar
    Chromebooks
    Components
    Connected Home
    Consumer Electronics General
    Consumer Electronics - General
    Corning
    COVID
    Crypto
    Deepfake
    Deepseek
    Display Panels
    DLB
    E-Ink
    E Paper
    E-paper
    Facebook
    Facial Recognition
    Foldables
    Foxconn
    Free Space Optical Communication
    Global Foundries
    GOOG
    Hacking
    Hannstar
    Headphones
    Hisense
    HKC
    Huawei
    Idemitsu Kosan
    Igzo
    Ink Jet Printing
    Innolux
    Japan Display
    JOLED
    LEDs
    Lg Display
    Lg Electronics
    LG Innotek
    LIDAR
    Matter
    Mediatek
    Meta
    Metaverse
    Micro LED
    Micro-LED
    Micro-OLED
    Mini LED
    Misc.
    MmWave
    Monitors
    Nanosys
    NFT
    Notebooks
    Oled
    OpenAI
    QCOM
    QD/OLED
    Quantum Dots
    RFID
    Robotics
    Royole
    Samsung
    Samsung Display
    Samsung Electronics
    Sanan
    Semiconductors
    Sensors
    Sharp
    Shipping
    Smartphones
    Smart Stuff
    SNE
    Software
    Tariffs
    TCL
    Thaad
    Tianma
    TikTok
    TSM
    TV
    Universal Display
    Visionox
    VR
    Wearables
    Xiaomi

    RSS Feed

Site powered by Weebly. Managed by Bluehost