Smart Home Survey
The CE world is full of surveys, most of which are self-serving. Similar to white papers, they have a bias toward supporting the product, technology, or concept that the writer happens to be associated with, and the LGE survey is no different in that LGE has a stake in the ‘Smart Home’ through its appliances and other CE products that are based on the company’s “ThinQ” control ‘vision’ that allows its devices to be controlled via a smartphone or similar mobile device. The LGE product line encompasses this ‘vision’ in almost all of its products, at least those on the high-end of the lines, and allows for a multitude of automated functions, some of which are shown in the table below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23b23/23b23b64afa61e9da77274b4a558c063f8115022" alt="Picture"
The survey went a bit further with the ‘very satisfied’ question, as it broke out the percentage of ‘very satisfied’ Smart Home product buyers by their ‘knowledge of AI’, refuting the assumption that you had to have some understanding of artificial intelligence to be a supporter of Smart Home products. According to the survey data those with the least understanding of AI were the highest percentage of the ‘very satisfied’ group, implying that you don’t have to understand the technology in Smart Home products to appreciate its value. To us this is very self-serving in that it implies that artificial intelligence is a big part of such consumer products, when much of the ‘data’ drawn from Smart Home products is from relatively simple sensors and control systems. Much of the ‘intelligence’ comes from look-up tables so ‘intelligence’ might be a bit of an exaggeration and few of such products actually ‘learn’ in the same sense as true AI systems do. Also we doubt that those who indicated they have ‘high’ AI knowledge understand even the basics of natural language processing or object recognition algorithms that are basic forms of AI, so we put little credibility in the table below, which breaks out that data.
Differentiation is a key tenet in the consumer electronics business and Smart Home products tend to be a way for brands to make their products stand out, but the idea that there is a universal ‘Smart Home’ system that will allow all of the devices in your home to constantly chatter with each other and keep your home in tip top shape is a fallacy. Looking just at the number of apps one would need to have on their smartphone to control each brand’s products should be a good indication that we are not at Jetson level, and the simple fact that most Smart Home systems are not compatible with each other makes Smart Home more of a marketing idea than a practical one.
Surveys are nice but are easily able to present a biased picture, and while this survey did its job of showing how Smart Home products can enhance your lifestyle, it does little to indicate the practicality of such systems. We have been testing and using what might be called Smart Home products for over 20 years and still wait for the day when a universal hub application can operate them all. It is certainly better today with smartphone control applications than it was years ago, chasing down a myriad of remote control devices, but the Smart Home industry still has a way to go before it really becomes ‘smart’.